tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:/posts Collective Identity G325 2018-01-15T13:09:03Z tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/982370 2016-01-31T14:42:47Z 2016-01-31T14:42:47Z <content type="html"> <![CDATA[<div class="posthaven-post-body"><p><iframe width="800" height="450" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/71pXYIwYpaU?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p></div>]]> </content> <author> <name/> </author> </entry> <entry> <id>tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/962467</id> <published>2016-01-03T08:33:18Z</published> <updated>2016-01-03T08:33:18Z</updated> <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://collectiveidentity.posthaven.com/bfi-media-conference-resources"/> <title>BFI Media Conference resources

http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-identities-and-the-media-rob-miller-2015.pdf


http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-role-social-media-in-construction-of-identities-rob-miller-2015.pdf


http://www.bfi.org.uk/education-research/teaching-film-tv-media-studies/bfi-media-conference

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345452 2015-03-27T12:30:00Z 2015-03-27T01:59:54Z How to use this blog


 This blog is for those students who are studying Media and Collective Identity for the A2 OCR Media G325 paper. Media and Collective Identity is one of six topics included in the Section B.

Below are the four prompt questions from the OCR Specification - basically the type of question you could expect in the exam.

How do the contemporary media represent nations, regions and ethnic / social / collective
groups of people in different ways?

How does contemporary representation compare to previous time periods?

What are the social implications of different media representations of groups of people? 

To what extent is human identity increasingly ‘mediated’?  

OR How does media influence collective identity?

Candidates might explore combinations of any media representation across two media, or two
different representations across two media. We mainly did TV and Film, but there's bits of advertising on this blog, comics, newspapers etc.

The collective we studied was BRITISH YOUTH. (The British bit was mainly there so we don't have to worry about all the Hollywood coming of age films.)

Clicking on the above links should take you an attempt to answer these questions. These aren't the right answers or even a suggested essay plan - just several ideas of how to tackle the question, links to examples and articles, and to be fair, a bit of waffle. They should be use to supplement your own ideas and approach.

Also on this blog are clips, reviews and articles related to the texts we viewed and used during the course. The clips are important as you must back any arguments or views, during the exam, with specific examples.

How I suggest you use this blog - is look at the Prompt questions, see if the content in these post make sense. If not explore the blog using the tags.

Lastly please leave comments - any suggestions on what you find useful or not, or accurate or not would really be helpful.

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/795883 2015-01-14T14:17:53Z 2015-01-14T14:17:53Z Chris Poole - Identity and anonymity online

http://www.wired.com/2011/10/you-are-not-your-name-and-photo-a-call-to-re-imagine-identity/

http://boingboing.net/2014/12/31/how-imageboard-culture-shaped.html

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/776899 2014-12-01T04:47:44Z 2014-12-01T04:47:45Z Cool hunting - US teen

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cool/view/

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/762480 2014-10-30T08:08:46Z 2014-10-30T08:08:46Z <content type="html"> <![CDATA[<div class="posthaven-post-body"><p><iframe width="800" height="450" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5jny68mFF8k?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p></div>]]> </content> <author> <name/> </author> </entry> <entry> <id>tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/761802</id> <published>2014-10-29T03:43:28Z</published> <updated>2014-12-30T13:30:32Z</updated> <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://collectiveidentity.posthaven.com/consumerism-and-identity"/> <title>Consumerism and Identity

http://hilo.hawaii.edu/academics/hohonu/documents/vol10x12youarewhatyoubuy-postmodernconsumerismandtheconstructionofself.pdf

http://planner.se/2010/03/generation-i-the-fallacy-of-individuality/

http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/isj79/cox.htm



]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/757831 2014-10-20T15:49:22Z 2014-10-20T15:49:22Z <content type="html"> <![CDATA[<div class="posthaven-post-body"><p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/05/neoliberalism-mental-health-rich-poverty-economy">http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/05/neoliberalism-mental-health-rich-poverty-economy</a><br></p></div>]]> </content> <author> <name/> </author> </entry> <entry> <id>tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/751126</id> <published>2014-10-05T12:51:05Z</published> <updated>2014-10-05T12:51:05Z</updated> <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://collectiveidentity.posthaven.com/future-identities-uk-government-report"/> <title>Future Identities - UK Government report

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/future-identities-changing-identities-in-the-uk

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/750113 2014-10-02T15:28:14Z 2014-10-02T15:28:14Z Talk on Identity and the web

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/735835 2014-09-03T08:06:05Z 2014-09-03T08:06:05Z Recent advertising

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/656573 2014-02-20T10:42:51Z 2014-02-28T12:50:08Z Vice article on modern youth culture

http://m.vice.com/en_uk/read/neknominations-are-the-last-subculture


+


http://www.danah.org/itscomplicated/

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/635124 2013-12-27T20:27:05Z 2018-01-15T13:09:03Z Atlhusser and Identity

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/608486 2013-10-13T18:14:21Z 2013-10-13T18:14:22Z Parody on Media treatment of youth (Australia)

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/580848 2013-05-23T08:50:00Z 2014-03-04T11:27:51Z How does the media influence collective identity?

How do media representations influence collective identity?

This is slightly different to the prompt question of ‘how is human identity increasingly mediated’, as it asks how media influences a collective rather than individual identity. The medias influence on individual identity can of course be included in this but you have to be sure to answer the specific question.

This question has also appeared in the exam in the following form:

'The media do not construct identity; they merely reflect it'. Discuss.

Here you to weigh up how influential the media is in constructing identity, with this quote suggesting it isn’t influential at all – a position that you should argue for and against. Here is doesn’t specific collective or personal identity – so both could be used.

Here is a structure you could use for the question in the header
How do media representations influence collective identity?

Remember that to answer any question you need a combination of theory, quotes, references from case studies from TWO forms of media (TV, film, adverts, pop videos), reference to past representations.

Define collective identity.
‘A collective identity may have been first constructed by outsiders who may still enforce it, but depends on some acceptance by those to whom it is applied.Poletta & Jasper

Taking this is as start point we can assess the influence of the media of the two main participants in the construction of collective identity:
a) The outsider: the adult world
b) The collective: UK youth

a) What sort of representations do the adult world receive?
Demonisation (give an example – news, Harry Brown, Eden Lake)
Popular notions of adolescence (forming identity, storm and stress – specific examples, Inbetweeners, Youngers)

Just how influential are these representations:
Louis Althusser - the power of the mass media is in its ability to present a subject in a particular way and have the their representation of that subject become a reality.

You could mention that the adult world has historical been fed very similar representations (demonisation – mods and rockers hysteria, popular notions – Billy Liar). This brings in the idea that the media perpetuates existing ideas and representations.

 

b) What sort of representations do UK Youth receive about themselves?
Bombarded with messages of what youth and growing up should be about that fall in line with the popular notions of adolescence:

Young and reckless, having fun: Tulisa, Samsung Jet advert
Identity formation/coming of age: Away Days, Submarine
Experimentation and partying: Inbetweeners, Skins

Just how influential are these representations:
Judith Butler - Identity is a performance (that includes the daily behaviour of individuals) which is based on social norms or habits. You are what you do.
The media informs these social norms and therefore influence identity.

AND the popular notions of adolescence can be seen as the real or imagined shared attributes and experience’ that David Snow argues are needed to create a collective identity. So UK youth become aware of these shared experiences due to the media and therefore understand they belong to a collective identity because of the media.

At this point you could reflect and see that using this argument that the media is very influential in constructing an identity.

COUNTER ARGUMENT

David Gauntlett 

‘The power relationship between the media and the audience involves - a lot of both. The media sends out a lot of messages about identity and acceptable forms of self-expression, gender sexuality and lifestyle. At the same time, the public have their own, even more robust, set of diverse feelings on the subject. The media’s suggestions may be seductive, but can never overpower contrary feelings in the audience.’


“The role model remains an important concept, although it should not be taken to mean someone that a person wants to copy. Instead, role models serve as navigation points as individuals steer their own personal routes through life.'

This is the idea that individuals use media and representations to help inform the construction of our identity (and collective identity), but the media is not all powerful, we use it selectively.

 

 

 

 

How collective identities explicitly used the media to construct identity
Youth - Sub Cultures
The significance of subcultures for their participants is that they offer a solution to structural dislocations through the establishment of an achieved identity - the selection of certain elements of style outside of those associated with the ascribed identity offered by work, home, or school. - Michael Brake

Brake argues that subcultures form as youth have a desire to control their collective identity beyond what has already shaped them (class, education), and construct this identity with ‘selection of certain elements of style’. This selection include music, fashion and film. (E.g Mods (Italian culture, R’n’B Tamla), Rockers (Marlon Brando/James Dean, rock’n’roll).

There is an argument that is the media has hampered the development of youth sub-cultures as new movements have no time to grow organically before the culture is marketed, commoditised and sold back to the youth:

Children and Youth are a distinct social group and want to be treated as such. A successful example of this is the TV Channel Nickelodeon where it’s all about kids; their views, interests, not being adults, about being fun and innovative. It gives children a sense of empowerment. But we must remember that adults have sold this empowerment to them. So this idea of independence is not true it is more about enabling children to be independent consumers but masquerading it as social rights. - David Buckingham


Young people’s use of digital and social Media
‘Convergence does not occur through media appliances, however sophisticated they may become. Convergence occurs within the brains of individual consumers and through their social interactions with others. Each of us constructs our own personal mythology from bits and fragments of information extracted from the media flow and transformed into resources through which we make sense of our everyday lives.’ – Henry Jenkins

How could this be applied to Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr usuage.

Conclusion
Sum up what you’ve just said and evaluate which of the arguments you believe is stronger.

 

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/579079 2013-05-16T06:41:00Z 2013-12-27T20:33:23Z Analyse the ways in which the media represent groups of people

Analyse the ways in which the media represent groups of people.

This is one of the prompt questions and has appeared in the exam MOST years in different forms:


Analyse the ways in which the media represent one group of people you have studied.

With reference to any one group of people that you have studied, discuss how their identity has been 'mediated'.

Discuss how one or more groups of people are represented through the media.

Analyse the ways in which at least one group of people is 'mediated'.

If the word MEDIATED comes up here’s a few ideas about it to include in an introduction which then allows you go on to talk about your case studies.

"Mediation is the process of the representation of events/people through the media." Gurevitch & Roberts
 
Mediated experiences make us reflect upon and rethink our own self-narrative in relation to others - Gary Giddens (1991)

Almost everything we see comes to us through the media prism which in turn colours not just our view of this life but our own self-definition.
Thomas de Zengotita, Mediated: The Hidden Effect of the Media on You and Your World (2005)


The word mediated is another way of talking how the media represents things, but a word that emphasises the idea that representation is a CONSTRUCTION of reality – fore-grounding, selecting, filtering reality.

Also in your introduction mention what collective identity you have studied (UK youth) and maybe what media types you have looked at (film, news, TV, advertising, music video).

Use the following headers to structure a response to the above question – what YOU must do is look for SPECIFIC examples (key scenes/characters) from the texts we have studied and explain why they are appropriate. Ensure they are CONTEMPORARY examples (from the last 5 years).

You can mention past representations (Billy Liar, Press Gang, Kids Rule OK) but ONLY in comparison with the contemporary ones to highlight a certain point.


E.g. Jay in Youngers, while a very contemporary representation in terms of issues (gang violence, multi-culturalism) and mise-en-scene (urban street culture, South London), has many similarities with the lead character from the 1963 film Billy Liar… (multiple girlfriends, aspirations of fame, conflict with family).

 You can also discuss the future of representation of UK youth and if you believe it will develop or will it continue in similar way. What factors could change this?

  

1) Youth are often represented in accordance with popular or hegemonic notions of adolescence

a) ‘A period of ‘storm and stress’ characterised by intergenerational conflicts, mood swings and an enthusiasm for risky behaviour.’
G. Stanley Hall (1906)


b) ‘Adolescence is conflict between identity and ‘role confusion’. Resolving this conflict involves finding a settled role in life. If unsuccessful this results in ‘maladaption’ in the form of fanaticism or the rejection of adult responsibility.’
Erik Erikson  (1968)

c) Adolescence is a critical period of identity formation in which individuals over uncertainty, become more self-aware of their strengths and weaknesses.
Erik Erikson  (1968)

d) Adolescence is primarily a state of transition, a matter of becoming rather than being. 

e) Continuing ‘confusion’ about one’s identity is a mark of incomplete development and may result in deviant or antisocial behaviour.
Erik Erikson  (1968)

 

2. Youth are often ‘demonised’ the mass media.
To demonise: to represent as diabolically evil.
‘Demonisation can only come about if there is some collective identity to point at.’ – Stanley Cohen (Folk Devils and Moral Panics)

a) ‘We found some news coverage where teen boys were described in glowing terms – 'model student', 'angel', 'altar boy' or 'every mother's perfect son', but sadly these were reserved for teenage boys who met a violent and untimely death."
‘Hoodies or Altar Boys’


b) ‘the true horrors we fear day to day are not supernatural bogeymen or monsters created by scientists. They're our own youth. 
Daily Mail review of Eden Lake

c) ‘I was reminded of something that the late Alexander Walker, film critic of the London Evening Standard, once wrote about Kubrick's Clockwork Orange: we hate and fear our children - because they are going to kill us.’
Peter Bradshaw- Guardian – review of Eden Lake

  

3. Youth are represented as being let down by adults

a) ‘Parents aren't always around to help socialize their children — or even just to show them affection. Compared to other cultures, British kids are less integrated into the adult world and spend more time with peers. 
Britain’s Mean Streets, Time Magazine

 
b) “Young people want to make healthy and informed decisions… but until now, too many have been let down by the education system. “Katrina Mather, 16, Member of Youth Parliament

 

4. Youth are represented as part of a subculture

‘The role of youth culture involves offering symbolic elements that are used by youth to construct an identity outside the restraints of class and education.’
Michael Brake


c) ‘Youth re-appropriate artefacts which creates group identity and promotes mutual recognition by members.’
Jonathan Epstein

 

5. Alienation – youth are represented as being estranged from parts of society

a) “The Youth are prohibited from speaking as moral and political agents.” Henry A. Giroux

 
b) ‘Adolescence is a growth period conducive to alienation due the ‘betwixt & between’ nature of the this particular position in life-course.’ Calabrese

c) Young people do not trust older generations.



6. Youth are product of the society they were born into, and often embody the faults and fears of adult society. 

“Prohibited from speaking as moral and political agents, youth become an empty category inhabited by the desires, fantasies, and interests of the adult world.” Henry A. Giroux


7. Representations of UK Youth are often nostalgic and romanticized

a) ‘Adolescence is the most intense of life-stages. Amidst its swirling emotions, raging hormones and many-fronted conflicts, we shape the identity that will stay with us into adulthood. Few of us emerge from this ordeal with our self-regard unscathed. Perhaps, though, we want to believe we did. - Submarine shows us how… flattering those who are safely beyond the torments of their youth.’
David Cox (Guardian)


b) ‘Recent research has pointed to the dangers of romanticising youthful resistance and the tendency to overstate the political dimensions of youth culture – these days youth cultures are increasingly diverse and fragmented as “scenes” or “lifestyles” to which young people may be only temporarily attached.
David Buckingham, Introducing Identity

 

 

 

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/582309 2013-05-15T07:53:00Z 2013-10-08T17:26:02Z Tumblr and Collective Identity

How dare we be so beautiful?!

On the teenager portraits of Rico Scagliola & Michael Meier.
http://tacohiddebakker.com/texts/how-dare-we-be-so-beautiful/


An androgynous character dressed in white shoes, jeans, and a nearly half-open black shirt sits relaxed and slightly leaning forward by a tiny pond in a garden, posing for a photograph. (S)he is looking downwards at his/her mirror image, reflected from the surface of the water. This image, in its general composition not quite unlike Caravaggio’s painting depicting an actively forward-leaning Narcissus, offers some clues about a giant photographic enterprise which resulted in a multimedia installation named Double Extension Beauty Tubes, combining still and moving images with a soundtrack, and a hefty paper volume called Neue Menschen (New People).

Collaborating with teenagers over the course of almost three years from 2008 until early 2011, Swiss photographer duo Rico Scagliola (1985) and Michael Meier (1982) had accumulated a vast archive of about 8,000 photographs, showing a cross-section of some of the more extravagant stylish expressions of teens’ subcultures of the day. According to Rico & Michael, henceforth colloquially calling them like they call themselves via their web site, in an introductory video they produced for the book, it shall be a testimony to the love affair of today’s teenagers’ real and virtual lives. Their cultural life is very much colored by pop and underground music, film, fashion, and the internet. Glimpses of the backgrounds and stages of their daily lives can be seen in some of the photographs; IKEA-styled suburban middle-class homes and poster-ridden bedrooms.

 

Feeling that somehow they had missed out on their own youth, Rico & Michael started making friends with teenagers and photograph them the way they would like to see themselves and want to be seen. Through film and photography, clearly. Starting to photograph Emos who were hanging out at and around the main railway station of Zurich every night, other youngsters belonging to neighbouring subcultures (Goths, Punks, Indies, Metalheads et cet) were soon to follow. The different groups were blending easily together, and some people would change styles as if changing clothes. Youth subcultures are not as clearly distinct anymore like they were in pre-internet times.

Rico & Michael sensed that the newest generation of teenagers was being dismissed as not having a proper voice of their own. But do people in the midst of the transformation from children to adults ever really have a voice of their own? Adolescence is one of the most formative stages in the lives of human beings for the discovery and development of a voice of one’s own. However, in the technologically advanced world, today’s young generations (often called “digital natives”) are being born into fast-paced digital times, in which developing a vision on the creation and dissemination of images of one’s own is equally important to – if not more important than – the formation of a unique and opinionated voice on real life and public events. Many of the adolescents who were portrayed by Rico & Michael are astoundingly mature in their skills of posing for cameras. In their virtual universes they are masters of masquerade and disguise. They have an almost inborn talent for staging and for compository framing. The boundaries demarcating what is real and what is fictitious are more fluid than ever before. This perhaps being one of the reasons for the disavowal of the new people by older generations (the “analog natives”). Today’s children and teenagers demand to be seen rather than to be heard. Visual style is everything.

 

Whereas the mythological Narcissus was not aware that he was merely gazing at his mirrored self-portrait, today’s image-saturated youth is very well aware of the carefully constructed artificiality of their reflected myriad selves. The iGeneration falls in love (or tries to do so) with their transformed selves inspired by the appearances of fashionable pop stars (Lady Gaga to whom Neue Menschen is dedicated being the most important), or with their new selves collaged together from bits and pieces found within the gargantuan digital image junk heap. Unlike Narcissus, they fall in love with faces that they recognize as theirs although they have been consciously transformed into other temporary identities. For many of the teenagers who are maturing during the times of facebook and flickr playful metamorphosis and sharing photographs thereof becomes a proof of their existence. This encompasses a self-consciousness that is literally a form of ex-istence – a being out of oneself.

Modern life is one of the best subjects for photography, according to photo-critic Gerry Badger, albeit being a subject that quickly fades into history.(1) Rather than playing the snake biting its tail (photography reacting on other art or photography), photographers make more interesting work when they turn their lenses outward. And what subject could be more intriguing and ambiguous than the teenagers of the image-saturated online age. Photographing teenagers with such a keen visual aptitude means both an inward and an outward turning of the lens. It is a focus on real people as they imagine themselves based on images of other real people.

As quickly as an actual subject may fade into history, it fades into nothing if there is no history to be made through imaginative documentation. A sensitive, imaginative, and collaborative documentary approach is one of the strengths of Rico & Michael’s portrayal of the teenagers. The photographers wanted to blur any clear distinction between their roles as authors and their subject’s roles as models. The kids were as much involved in the image-making process as the photographers, and when they had not yet conceived of how exactly they wanted to be photographed, Rico & Michael would stage and picture them in ways they deemed fitting to their respective self-perceptions. The series is not a documentary about teenage subcultures per se. Most importantly it is about today’s teenagers’ visual awareness, their fashions as an essence of their self-consciousness and their aptitude of cultivating self-images. In Rico & Michael’s words their project is a documentation of “the construction of [the teenagers’] pictured identity.”(2) It is a photographic document of the new generation’s inborn talent for mise-en-scène, for their talents for the staging of oneself as another.

The subversive somewhat provocative undertone of the otherwise tautological title Neue Menschen (the youngest generation is new per definition, physically at least) suggests that teenagers nowadays are somehow radically different in comparison to earlier generations. Is it the hypermedial online world basically informing them from birth on which accounts for this difference? Every change in technology changes the way people behave and interact with each other, and faster changes in technology tend to provoke quicker generation shifts. But in digital wonderland we are all too young still to already come to serious conclusions on this matter. Rico & Michael want to have their book title sound like a big and bold statement and at the same time clarifying that it deals with a contemporary subject. Its actual actuality may be part of history soon, the fantasized photo-selves in Neue Menschen will be forever young. Photographs don’t age any longer and fashion styles are part of an eternal cycle of renewal.

When asked about the importance of documenting the cultures of today’s teenagers, Lauren A. Wright, who in 2011 curated a large exhibition on twentieth-century youth cultures, had an admirable answer: “I think it’s always important to recognize the huge influence of teenagers on our culture past and present, particularly in light of the ambivalent place they occupy. We really do both love and loathe them.”(3) Young people can teach us as much as older generations can teach them. As long as we stay open and never forget about our younger selves within our older selves. In the end, all that Rico & Michael ask from us is to love the kids they portrayed with careful attention and love themselves. If we can’t embrace every teenager around for real, the least we can do is to immerse ourselves for a moment in the fantastic though often dark imagery in which teens show off their roles and their uncertain identities. A praise stronger and more concise than the following comment on a picture that’s up at one of the photographer’s facebook-pages is hardly possible: Luv it pic!


Young people’s use of digital and social Media

‘Convergence does not occur through media appliances, however sophisticated they may become. Convergence occurs within the brains of individual consumers and through their social interactions with others. Each of us constructs our own personal mythology from bits and fragments of information extracted from the media flow and transformed into resources through which we make sense of our everyday lives.’ – Henry Jenkins (Convergence Culture)

We interact with others to create an identity. This is called identity negotiation. This develops a consistent set of behaviours that reinforce the identity of the person or group. These behaviours then become social expectations”. - Stella Ting-Toomey

 

How do you think we could use these quotes to understand how identity is formed online both individually and as part of a collective?

 

Look at forums, Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter – have young people constructed a collective identity by developing a consistent set of behaviours’?

What are these behaviours?


What are the conventions of use of social media? How do you think they developed?



‘Each of us constructs our own personal mythology from bits and fragments of information extracted from the media flow and transformed into resources through which we make sense of our everyday lives.
’ Jenkins. Can you identify examples of this use of media on your social media or others?

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/577689 2013-05-06T21:32:49Z 2013-10-08T17:25:06Z <content type="html"> <![CDATA[<div class="posthaven-post-body"><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.ymresourcer.com/model/subcult1.htm"><a href="http://www.ymresourcer.com/model/subcult1.htm">http://www.ymresourcer.com/model/subcult1.htm</a></a><br></p><p><a href="http://m.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/03/youth-representations-in-media?cat=commentisfree&type=article">http://m.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/03/youth-representations-in-media?cat=commentisfree&type=article</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://culturelag.wordpress.com/2012/02/12/youth-subcultures-and-delinquency/"><a href="http://culturelag.wordpress.com/2012/02/12/youth-subcultures-and-delinquency/">http://culturelag.wordpress.com/2012/02/12/youth-subcultures-and-delinquency/</a></a><br></p><p><br></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://tacohiddebakker.com/texts/how-dare-we-be-so-beautiful/"><a href="http://tacohiddebakker.com/texts/how-dare-we-be-so-beautiful/">http://tacohiddebakker.com/texts/how-dare-we-be-so-beautiful/</a></a><br></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.henryagiroux.com/online_articles/teenage_sexuality.htm"><a href="http://www.henryagiroux.com/online_articles/teenage_sexuality.htm">http://www.henryagiroux.com/online_articles/teenage_sexuality.htm</a></a><br></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.academia.edu/156134/The_Death_and_Life_of_Punk_The_Last_Subculture"></a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.academia.edu/156134/The_Death_and_Life_of_Punk_The_Last_Subculture"><a href="http://www.academia.edu/156134/The_Death_and_Life_of_Punk_The_Last_Subculture">http://www.academia.edu/156134/The_Death_and_Life_of_Punk_The_Last_Subculture</a></a></p><p></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.slideshare.net/fullscreen/cigdemkalem/prompt-4/1"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/fullscreen/cigdemkalem/prompt-4/1">http://www.slideshare.net/fullscreen/cigdemkalem/prompt-4/1</a></a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bethinking.org/who-am-i/advanced/postmodernism-and-the-question-of-identity.htm"><a href="http://www.bethinking.org/who-am-i/advanced/postmodernism-and-the-question-of-identity.htm">http://www.bethinking.org/who-am-i/advanced/postmodernism-and-the-question-of-identity.htm</a></a><br></p></div>]]> </content> <author> <name/> </author> </entry> <entry> <id>tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345382</id> <published>2013-02-26T12:35:32Z</published> <updated>2013-10-08T16:35:37Z</updated> <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://collectiveidentity.posthaven.com/175694884"/> <title>Untitled http://nymag.com/news/features/high-school-2013-1/]]> tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345385 2013-01-23T11:25:00Z 2013-10-08T16:35:37Z Submarine Articles

http://cinesthesiac.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/that-sinking-feeling-submarine.html

"None of this will matter when I'm 38," our hero tells himself - yet the audience, who may well be some distance ahead of him, will surely be aware that, in love, you often encounter the same damn problems over and over again, no matter your age, however smart you think you are.

Younger viewers may be reminded of Wes Anderson, and - given the middle-school setting - Rushmore in particular. Characters are defined by wardrobe choices: the youngsters by those insulating coats, the elders by what we might call Signifying Hair. If Hawkins is rather trapped by her period 'do - there's little room under that harsh Selina Scott fringe for the actress to demonstrate her usual charm - then Taylor's beard is precisely that one might have witnessed on an Open University presenter circa 1981, and Considine makes his Limahl-like fin mullet an integral part of Graham's bellendedness. There's an element of Anderson's self-conscious dress-up to all this - these are teenagers who act and speak as though they know they're in a book, or a movie (sample extract from Oliver's narration: "Her tongue was stained blue with blackcurrent squash; it smouldered in the cold") - yet here it all somehow funnels back into a sort-of true picture of the adolescent experience.

This, coupled with the protagonists' acute sense of being off-the-radar, may be whereSubmarine gets its title from, though there's water, water everywhere in Ayoade's film. From the stagnant duckpond in which hapless bullying victims are submerged to the gaudy fish tank prominently positioned in the Taits' kitchen, these characters are never too far away from that sinking feeling - the coats almost become lifejackets, constants to cling to - and desperately trying to raise their heads above an ever-mounting tide. It's apt the film should conclude with Oliver and Jordana staring at the sea, to paraphrase that old Cure album beloved of adolescent mopes: a moment of rare calm, leaving us wondering where the next wave - of hormones, of crises - will carry them.

 

 

 


http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/mar/17/submarine-review

Submarine
Production year: 2010
Country: UK
Cert (UK): 15
Runtime: 96 mins
Directors: Richard Ayoade
Cast: Craig Roberts, Noah Taylor, Paddy Considine, Sally Hawkins, Yasmin Paige
More on this film

Richard Ayoade probably first came to public attention by appearing in Garth Marenghi's Darkplace, a spoof horror television series by Matthew Holness about a psychogeographically troubled Romford hospital built over the gates of hell. Since then, he has written, directed and acted in TV shows including The Mighty Boosh, Nathan Barley and The IT Crowd, and also directed an Arctic Monkeys video. But nothing in his CV prepared me for the confidence and panache of the debut movie feature now being sprung on us.

It's a dark coming-of-age comedy about a lovelorn teenage boy in 1980s Swansea, written and directed by Ayoade, adapted from a novel by Joe Dunthorne, and executive produced by Ben Stiller, who appears in a subliminal cameo. Ayoade's film has absorbed the influences of Wes Anderson and Michel Gondry in its deadpan ironies and block capital sans-serif titles, but it's still really personal and confident. For sheer technique, Ayoade can hardly be faulted, though introducing characters in freezeframe/voiceover is getting to be a cliche. His film is shaped with flair, coolly allowing us to enjoy its unrealities and to savour the suspicion that a thirtysomething's sophistication and cinephilia have been sneakily backdated into a teenager's life to offset his emotional vulnerability: a protective nostalgia.

I never found Submarine moving exactly, despite the heavily signposted sadness and loneliness of every single major character; it runs essentially in a comedy groove and is a knight's move away from any emotional reality. For me, this somehow dissolves any potential lump in the throat. But it is touching, sweet and, most importantly, very funny. Watching it, I got exactly the same exhilarated feeling as with Edgar Wright's Shaun of the Dead: someone very talented at comedy had been allowed to take the helm of a British feature film and do precisely what he wanted to.

The star is Craig Roberts, playing Oliver Tate, a duffelcoat-wearing loner at school who doesn't hesitate to join in the bullying of an overweight girl whom he had secretly got off with at last term's wild-west-themed disco. This he does in order to impress Jordana, played by Yasmin Paige, who wears a faintly disturbing red coat (Ayoade may or may not have in mind Don't Look Now). She has a bullying streak and mild pyromania issues – in moments of intimacy, she likes to singe a boy's leg hairs with a lighted match. They get together, and the resulting placidity and comfort settles them both. But there are complications. Oliver's parents Lloyd (Noah Taylor) and Jill (Sally Hawkins) are experiencing a marital crisis triggered by the appearance of Jill's old flame Graham (Paddy Considine), a dynamic new age self-help guru who runs seminars and sells motivational videos about one's colour-aura. Jordana's mother Jude (Melanie Walters) is also seriously ill.

The glorious note of self-pity is sounded at the very first with Oliver's fantasy of what would happen if he committed suicide – an orgy of candle-lit vigils and sobbing teenage girls confiding their adoration for Oliver to local news teams. Throughout, Oliver maintains the stunned expression of someone who has been slapped in the face with a fish, and rarely smiles. As his dad, Taylor looks agonised, face deeply incised with wrinkles and far older than his years. Sally Hawkins plays a repressed woman with weird Thunderbird-puppet mannerisms. Everything about her life is difficult, including a workplace where the tradition is that you have to bring in your own cake on your birthday, an exquisitely uncomfortable touch. Considine's spiritual ninja Graham unlocks long-forgotten passions within Jill. She crisply informs her traumatised son later: "I gave Graham a handjob in the back of his van."

When the illness of Jordana's mother becomes grave, Oliver reads a child-psychology book about the importance of pets and how their death introduces children to the grieving process – so he makes an appallingly misjudged attempt to poison Jordana's dog in order to soften the blow of her mother's imminent demise. Like his mum's handjob confession, this is not credible, strictly speaking, but it is funny. Yet having succumbed almost to a breakdown over the Christmas lunch, Jordana's dad Brynn (Sion Tudor Owen) tearfully, brusquely demands that Owen think of himself as a member of their family. That is one moment that is genuinely moving.

For some, this movie will have a Marmitey taste: it will divide opinion. Arguably, it's a bit too cool for school sometimes, and it is self-conscious. But these are byproducts of its undoubted confidence at carrying off a visually distinctive, witty, autobiographical comedy. As for Ayoade, there's clearly a big future payday for him in Hollywood, if he wants it, but I can't help hoping he develops in depth and scope here, as a tremendous new voice in British film.


Submarine plumbs the depths of self-satisfaction
Nostalgic coming-of-age films feed our need to delude ourselves about the way we were

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2011/mar/21/submarine-richard-ayoade-teenage?intcmp=239

For his first feature, the NME-dubbed "coolest man in London" gives us an already acclaimed portrayal of adolescence in south Wales. You might reasonably have expected something funny, touching and perceptive, and at least according to its fans, Submarine is all of these things. You might also have hoped for a bit of insight into life on the threshold of adulthood in today's fretful Britain. Yet mobiles and iPods are mysteriously absent. In their place, we get record-players, tape-decks, typewriters and duffle-coats.

Director Richard Ayoade says of his film, "The idea was that it shouldn't be set in a particular time-frame." Still, Crocodile Dundee is on at the flicks, and that had its UK release in December 1986, which fits pretty much with the Thatcher-age props. This commandeering of the immediately pre-internet era reflects a strange penchant of the coming-of-age genre. Much of the time it seems to shun the present, and hark back to the fairly recent past.

Lately we've had An Education, and before that Billy Elliot and This Is England, but it's not just us. The likes of American Graffiti, Dazed and Confused, The Last Picture Show, My Girl and Stand by Me are all set in days of yore, but not very yore. So for that matter are A Nous les Petites Anglaises, Diabolo Menthe and the granddaddy of them all, Les Quatre Cents Coups.

Audiences seem happy enough with this approach, but it points to an obvious conclusion. It's not adolescence itself that attracts either film-makers or the rest of us; it's the urge to taste once more the madeleines of our very own temps perdu. In 1986, Ayoade, who's now 33, would himself have been approaching puberty. The book on which his film is based was set in 1997; in that year its author, Joe Dunthorne, and his hero Oliver were both aged 15 and living in Swansea.

There seems a bit more to all this than straightforward nostalgia. Adolescence is the most intense of life-stages. Amidst its swirling emotions, raging hormones and many-fronted conflicts, we shape the identity that will stay with us into adulthood. Few of us emerge from this ordeal with our self-regard unscathed. Perhaps, though, we want to believe we did. It's to this need that cinema seems to be addressing itself. Submarine shows us how.

Many of today's adolescents may seem gauche, mulish and angry. Yet back in the 80s, if Oliver and his girlfriend Jordana are anything to go by, they were quite unspeakably cute. Real teens often lose the capacity to communicate; Oliver turns his own life into a screenplay. Nowadays, skin trouble sometimes seems enough to destroy young lives; Jordana wears her barely perceptible eczema like a fashion accessory.

The cosseted youth of today may be tiresomely self-obsessed; we, however, didn't lock ourselves in our rooms with headphones clamped to our ears: we applied ourselves instead to saving our parents' marriages. For we were cooler, bolder and tougher than our puny contemporary counterparts. For us, bullying was more than a nasty remark on Facebook. We'd find a fat girl and push her into a pond, just to impress our sweetheart.

Hang on, though; doesn't that make us sound just a tiny bit horrible? Not to worry. Ayoade knows how to make an escapade like this look as winsome as could be. He describes Oliver as "mean and distant and selfish". Maybe we know deep down that at his age we too possessed such qualities. How reassuring to learn that in our young day they would have apparently made us lovable.

Other films about adolescence have provided much the same kind of comfort as Submarine, yet the coming-of-age story started out as more than a means of flattering those who are safely beyond the torments of their youth.

It has its roots in the Bildungsroman, perhaps Germany's most significant contribution to the flowering of the novel. The term was coined by a critic called Karl Morgenstern in the 1820s. He said that the genre had two purposes. It should portray "the hero's Bildung (formation) as it begins and proceeds to a certain level of perfection". Yet it should also foster "the Bildung of the reader to a greater extent than any other type of novel."

Oh well. The big screen has its own furrow to hoe.
]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345393 2013-01-14T12:30:19Z 2013-10-08T16:35:37Z Untitled http://m.io9.com/5974468/the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-prevent-you-from-being-rational]]> tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345396 2013-01-11T12:27:53Z 2018-01-15T10:02:39Z Theory Revision Sheet
Ricoeur: The self is essentially a fiction through which we understand our lives as coherent stories (“narrative identity”). We are the stories we inhabit and tell about ourselves.
]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345405 2013-01-07T21:42:19Z 2013-10-08T16:35:38Z Untitled http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/aug/18/youth-culture-movies]]> tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345473 2011-08-17T16:16:00Z 2013-10-08T16:35:38Z UK Riots - some articles

Here's one from the Economist - very good about fear the hooligan and moral panic.

The Guardian - talking about representation of urban communities and the riots.

Here's a post from Pete Fraser's blog with some interesting links and PPT from David Buckingham.

And the Guardian's amazing resources.

 

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345504 2011-06-15T07:58:21Z 2013-10-08T16:35:39Z Past Paper Questions

June 2010
Analyse the ways in which the media represent groups of people. 

What is collective identity and how is it mediated? 

January 2011
Analyse the ways in which the media represent one group of people you
have studied.

'The media do no construct identity; they merely reflect it'. Discuss. 

June 2011
With reference to any one group of people that you have studied,
discuss how their identity has been 'mediated'.

'Media representations are complex, not simple and straightforward'. How far do you agree with this statement in relation to the collective group that you have studied?

January 2012
Discuss how one or more groups of people are represented through the media.

Explain the role played by the media in the construction of collective identity.

June 2012
Analyse the ways in which at least one group of people is 'mediated'.

Discuss the social implications of media in relation to collective identity.

January 2013
How do media representations influence collective identity?

Discuss the different ways in which groups of people are represented by the media.

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345535 2011-05-30T15:45:00Z 2018-01-15T10:03:26Z Revision Top Trump Cards

Right - I'm not too convinced how this will work, but here's the thinking behind this. Here are character Top Trump cards with ratings (1-10) rating the representational areas of characters from the texts we have studied. The idea is that if you play the game you'll quickly learn which characters have the most risky behaviour, or struggle with their role in life etc. Oh and 'inter-gen conflicts' is short for 'intergenerational conflicts' (arguments with parents/adults etc).

The ratings and designs were created by the wonderful Level 3 Year 12 students on the Creative and Media Diploma. You can change the ratings if you feel their judgement is incorrect.

Anyway - it's all there.

 

And below is all the research that went into making these cards. All this is analysis and opinion from individual students - so feel free to argue against and interpret the criteria and cards as you wish.

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345565 2011-05-24T11:39:00Z 2013-10-08T16:35:40Z How does contemporary representation compare to previous time periods?

This prompt question is a relatively open one and your answers will vary depending on the texts that you have studied. We looked at Press Gang from 1989 (specifically episode 1 of the first series) and the film Billy Liar (1963) about which you can read more here and here.

When answering this question concentrate on the word 'representation'. This question isn't asking you to know about how youths have changed over the ages, this isn't a sociological study - it's about how UK youth's behaviour is shown, presented, REPRESENTED. So what sort of behaviour do the texts focus on? How are inter-generational conflicts resolved? How is bad behaviour presented - demonised or immaturity? What aspirations or roles do they fulfil?

Below are a few clips to get you going. Again - don't be thinking that back in 1989 (when Press Gang was out) UK youth were nicer and politer (there were some right ones back then) - it's the media representations that has changed.

Flirting in Press Gang vs Flirting in Misfits

 

Bad behaviour in Press Gang

Compare this to Skins/Misfits.

Attitude to adults in Press Gang vs Misfits

Have a look at this clip from Stewart Lee which answers the question from his point of view in terms of Skins compared with the television he grew up with. What's interesting is that when Lee was growing up, most TV shows aimed at teenagers fell under the Kids TV remit so were usually on around tea-time (six o'clock) rather than the post 10.00 p.m. scheduling that is used for Inbetweeners, Skins and Misfits. So it is clear that producers (such as E4) believe in order to reflect the lives of and attract teenage audiences they need something bit edgier than a kids running Youth Newspaper or the adventures of astrophysicist Adam Brake and his young son Matthew.

Other things to think about
The role of adults - suffocating in Billy Liar, understanding in Press Gang - often conspicuous by their absence in many contemporary texts.

Aspirations of young people - Billy Liar fantasises about being a general or minister, in Press Gang they want to run a serious paper - in Misfits Nathan wants to shoot himself on telly and get women.

Representation of bad behaviour - Billy 'drugs' his girlfriend in order to get her 'in the mood'. This is played for laughs - would the same be done today?

Compare the trailer for Shank with the 1970's comic Kids Rule OK. What are the similarities?

Look at this post - choose a character from a contemporary and past text and compare them against the criteria.

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345571 2011-05-03T10:38:00Z 2013-10-08T16:35:40Z Youth being let down by adults

A common representation of youth is one of being let down by the adult world - be the parents, schools or authority. It's a representation that shows up in some unlikely texts such as Eden Lake, that from the trailer and a glimpse at the more horrific scenes, is pure and simply demonisation of youth (young = evil).
A closer look however sees the film continually try and lay the blame at the hands of the parents. The opening credit sequence has the young couple driving up the motorway while listening to a radio phone in discussing the problem of 'youth crime'. The callers continually pass the buck about who was to blame - the parents, the schools, the media - and so creates a representation of society unwilling to take responsibility. This is then expressed again when the couple express their concerns about the youths at the local cafe. 

The final brutal scene really emphasises where the film places the blame showing that the gang of youths are just a product of the society and families they come from. In fact the groups of parents are represented in the much the same way as the demonised youths - casual sex, binge drinking, controlled by a bullying leader, resolve situations with violence. Brett is just fulfilling the same role as he sees his father take, and end shot of Brett posing in the mirror could be viewed as evidence that Brett partly knows he is playing a role. Find the clip on this post here. [SPOILER WARNING - THIS IS THE END OF THE FILM].

This idea of 'youths' just be a product of the society they are raised in is also, briefly, explored in Harry Brown. The only time we get a glimpse inside the minds of the youths and therefore get some explanation for their criminal behaviour is in the police interview room.

Again, just like Brett in Eden Lake, the Noel Winters character explains that he is just following his father's foot steps. We also learn that Marky is particularly vulnerable due to the upbringing in care he received.

Lastly have a look at this short film called Cherries, and count the number of times the youth are let down by the authorities and institutions that are supposedly there to protect them.

]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345579 2011-04-28T09:22:00Z 2013-10-08T16:35:40Z Away Days articles

Kevin Sampson on the football hooliganism of Awaydays Times.co.uk

Kevin Sampson, [the author of Away Days] is an affable 46-year-old, still as lean as 20 years ago and dressed in a similar, sharp, urban manner. Like his characters, he’s a man of the moment — and ready for any criticism when Awaydays hits the streets. Some will see the film, to be released on May 22, as a glorification of football hooliganism.

“I’m expecting criticism,” he says. “But I’m not worried about it. I’m comfortable that the violence is not glamorised. It’s short, brutal and effective, like real life. There are no slow-motion shots. It’s not judgmental and it’s not gratuitous.”

He’s certain that the balance is right in Pat Holden’s film because Sampson lived through the sort of breathtaking, frenetic squalls of violence that the film depicts. Like the film’s fictional characters, Paul Carty and Elvis, he travelled up and down the country following his team in the late 1970s. It was an era when journeys were infused with threat; a malevolent piquancy that enhanced the experience. “It’s young men running wild,” he says. “That’s what young men do, whether you like it or not.”

The violence will grab the headlines but there is much more to Awaydays. The film is a coming-of-age story set in 1979, the first days of Thatcherism, a curiously flamboyant time for these lost boys of Birkenhead. The plot is driven by fashion and pulsating music as much as brutality. It is the best representation of the beginnings of the “casual” culture to reach the screen.

Carty, played by Nicky Bell, is a teenager recovering from the death of his mother. He is drawn, via the enigmatic Elvis, to a group of Tranmere Rovers fans known as the Pack. Carty is never able to gain a sense of belonging within the group, which is intent on building a reputation through causing havoc. In Elvis, however, Carty finds a kindred spirit. Liam Boyle’s Elvis is mesmerising, switching from romantic dreamer to psychotic hooligan in the swish of a Stanley knife blade.

“It was a time when there was a convergence between music and football,” Sampson says. “There was a dress code and a code of behaviour. It was very seductive.”

Most films about football fans emphasise the macho element of the culture. For Sampson this is a fundamental misunderstanding. “The wedge haircut arrived,” he says. “It was amazing. These fresh-faced young boys had this camp, plumped-up bowl of hair with a long fringe over one eye. I saw it most clearly when Arsenal came up for the League Cup semi-final in 1978. They brought the biggest mob I’d seen at Anfield. They were a sea of denim, thousands, all boot boys. Very butch. On the other side of the barrier were four or five hundred Liverpool urchins, young lads, all with duffel coats and massive fringes. They looked so effeminate, but they fought with the Arsenal all the way back to the station. It was one of the most terrifying and exhilarating nights of my life. I wanted a wedge. A duffel coat. To be part of it all.”

Unsurprisingly, he is looking little farther than Awaydays at the moment. Will he feel responsible if some are drawn to violence by the film? “No. It happens and always will. There’s depression in the air and it wouldn’t surprise me to see trouble making a comeback. When there’s no money around, no jobs and no status, young, working-class men can get it through being hard, from violence. For the powerless any power is good, even if it’s only the power to scare.”

But to concentrate on brutality is to miss the point of Awaydays. The way the camera lingers on the clothes and training shoes gives a sense of the drooling desperation felt by the “dressers” — a sensual obsession most people tend to associate only with the New Romantics of the early 1980s.

Sampson says he wanted to capture something that was distinctive to Liverpool. “It happened here. It’s wired into the DNA of the Liverpudlian to be different, and when those people went to Europe en masse for the first time it altered their preconceptions. For me, it wasn’t about Stanley knives and anarchy, it was about an uprising of style.”


Away Days Review Film 4
The 1998 cult novel the film is adapted from, however, is just fascinating. Straddling Liverpool's music and football scenes circa 1979, this complex rites-of-passage tale explores class-tourism, teenage nihilism, pack-violence, and the unspoken homoerotic tensions in close male friendships.

As in the novel, arty Carty (Nicky Bell) becomes fascinated with the hooligans at Tranmere Rovers. His passport into this knife-wielding, wedge-cut world is Elvis (Liam Boyle), a young working-class romantic-savage who stands at the intersection between two subcultures. The noose he hangs in his new wave riot of a bedroom, "a reminder of the absurdity of life and certainty of death". The unlikely pair embark on a messy, complicated bromance, before the disturbed Elvis drifts into heroin abuse and a depressive spiral, while Carty is sucked ever deeper into a lifestyle he cannot control.


You looking at us? The Observer
The book is written in the voice and through the eyes of Paul Carty, a well-educated Merseyside teenager who yearns to be one of The Pack, a notorious gang of football hooligans. Carty has lost his mother a year previously and retreated into isolation. He's into Joy Division and Lou Reed, but his nihilistic search for thrills disguises a greater quest for identity and meaning in his young life. He meets a volatile, troubled soul called Mark Always – Elvis – and from that point something has to break.

British Teenage Tribes on the Big Screen:
Teddy Boys 1950s

Credited for bringing fashion to the postwar male consciousness, teddy boys sported clothes infl uenced by both Edwardian England and contemporary America – loose-collared white shirts with skinny ties and a brocade waistcoat, high-waisted trousers in a drainpipe cut and suede 'brothel creeper' shoes. Musically, meanwhile, they listened to early rock'n'roll by acts such as Carl Perkins, Jerry Lee Lewis and Elvis. As seen in: The Damned (Joseph Losey, 1963)

Rockers, 1950s/1960s
.
As the teddy boy subculture faded, it split into two distinct factions that formed their own subcultures: mods and rockers. Also known as greasers, rockers were infl uenced by American film and music and were synonymous with motorbikes. Their style was practical as much as it was fashionable – leather motorcycle jackets, aviator sunglasses, Levi's jeans and slicked-back hair – while Chuck Berry, Eddie Cochran and Bo Diddley soundtracked their lives. As seen in The Wild One (Laslo Benedek, 1953)

Mods, 1960s
Mods were also a rejection of mainstream British pop culture. Stemming from the material wealth of postwar working-class Britain, mods were characterised by Vespa scooters, expensive, tailored suits, button-pin badges and the Union Jack and RAF roundel symbol. Keen to be on the cutting edge, they listened to whatever was new, from African-American soul music to Jamaican ska, and frequented London's all-night nightclubs the Scene, the Flamingo and the Marquee. As seen in Quadrophenia (Franc Roddam, 1979)

Skinheads, 1970s

The harder mods soon merged into the early skinheads, at first a nonpolitical subculture that mixed with Jamaican rudeboys and danced at West Indian clubs. Later, skinheads became increasingly associated with racism and extreme right-wing politics. Eventually skins swapped ska for oi!, a thuggish strain of punk, although their main interest was football, to which they wore Ben Sherman shirts, braces and heavy workboots. As seen in This is England (Shane Meadows, 2006)

Casuals, 1980s
Heavily influenced by the skinhead subculture before them and the late-Seventies mod revival, casuals were noted for their participation in football hooliganism and fondness for designer clothing. The expensive labels helped them escape the attention of the police and infiltrate the pubs of rival football teams on match days. Their musical tastes were eclectic, but casuals are associated with acid house, techno and the Madchester and Britpop movements. As seen in The Business (Nick Love, 2005)

An interview with Kevin Sampson: He of Awaydays fame
Posted on January 25, 2013by notworththat
In 1998, a book was released which perfectly encapsulated the blossoming casual and music scene of the late 1970s when, as its synopsis says, “smack and Maggie Thatcher” were still less of an issue on Merseyside than Lois jeans and Adidas Forest Hills.
Following the trials and tribulations of Paul Carty, Awaydays became an overnight classic – delivering a swift literary kick to the chops of the more sensational and, it is fair to say, bollocks hooligan literature which had begun to surge in popularity in the years previous.
This wasn’t a glorification of the ‘we ran them’ on page boastery of some of the writers – and I use the term loosely – who Awaydays author Kevin Sampson now often finds himself unfairly pigeonholed with by lazy book websites.
Awaydays gave readers a real glimpse into the pressurised oneupmanship of the early casuals scene, an appreciation of what it feels like to both belong and not belong at the same time and an understanding of the battle against alienation felt by angry young men up and down the UK.
The fact the reader looked in armed with the foreboding knowledge of what awaited Liverpool under the looming threat of Thatcherism, unemployment and the nihilistic nightmare those conditions would create made the plight of Carty, his friend Elvis and their hooligan associates in the Pack all the more distressing and depressing. Here was a group of young men, many of whom would not have a way out even if they wanted one.
But, despite now being considered a classic of its type, Awaydays almost never made it to print. And, as Sampson explains, when it did, it was a few years late.
“I wrote a 65-page novella featuring Carty and Elvis, pretty much the same story as the one that eventually came out, but much more skeletal. If you think the ‘published’ version of Awaydays is a fast and furious read, this was like an electric shock.
“Penguin rejected it, I took it hard and that was that until 1995.
“Trainspotting had come out in 1993 and, for me, it changed the entire landscape. Suddenly publishers were actively looking out for gritty fiction that dealt with scenes and subcultures…The Beach, The Football Factory etc.
“I dug Awaydays out again in late 1995, not long after The Farm played their last ever gig. I thought yeah, good story, good characters but it could be so much more – so I set about, not so much re-writing it, but supplementing it and making it into the book that was eventually published in March 1998.”
But where did the original inspiration come from? Surely a lot of it is based on the author’s own experience?
“The genesis of Awaydays is a long story, but the short version is that I suppose one of the things that defines you as a writer is an eye for detail, a nose for a story. I’d been going to Anfield since I was five, mainly watching the game from my Dad’s knee in the Kemlyn Road.
“I was always obsessed by the crowd. Firstly The Kop, but from about the end of 1976, the Anfield Road End, where all the young hoodlums gathered. I was a typical outsider, looking in. Whatever they were wearing, I had to have it. So when the first seeds of what became the casual scene started in Liverpool, I was innately aware that this was a “story.”
“I was going to away games by then, and no-one else was dressing the way Liverpool and Everton (and Tranmere) were. My big interests in life were music, clothes, football and here were all three meshed into one underground movement – and it really was underground. In those early days – late 77, into 1978 – there were no evil businessmen pedalling their wares…it was completely organic.
“Whatever the lads from Kirkby, or Scottie Road or the Dingle were wearing, we’d all copy them. The writer in me recognised that this was like a modern (then) version of Quadrophenia, this whole subculture that no-one knew anything about.
“From the age of about 15 I’d wanted to write a novel; nothing highbrow, I just wanted to write books that would mean something to the kids I was knocking around with…clever, witty, curious working class boys and girls who were almost all unemployed.
“That’s where the original idea for Awaydays came from.”
Clearly then a subject close to his own heart. Did that create its own pressure? Taking on a scene which had at its heart something which was so important personally to the author, was there the fear he wouldn’t nail it? And was there a temptation to dilute the more serious material to appeal to the more mainstream football violence audience?
“Well, it was my first novel so the only pressure came from myself,” explains Sampson. “It’s only after you’re established, so to speak, that you’re even vaguely aware of the reader’s expectations.
“I wanted to evoke the world and the culture I was living through – I was convinced it was an important time politically, with Thatcher getting her claws into the nation’s youth, and culturally with the football/fashion movement. The challenge was to set a cracking story against the backdrop of that very special Merseyside scene. I hadn’t even thought about who the readership would be – I just wanted it to be true to the times, true to the scene.”
It would be fair to say then that the reaction must have been a nice surprise.
“I had no real expectations for the book. It could very easily have gone one way or the other. By the time it came out, I sort of knew it was going to be well-received by the critics; I was getting interview requests from the likes of The Guardian and The Independent. But in terms of a readership, I had no preconceptions at all. I remember my publisher phoning up to tell me they’d gone to a third re-print the week after the book came out and I could hear the excitement in his voice so, at that stage, I thought, okay, it’s a success. I’m happy.”
With Awaydays in the bag, Sampson – and his fans – clearly owed a debt of gratitude to Irvine Welsh, a man who Sampson himself is happy to credit as being his inspiration.
But who else does Sampson respect and, perhaps more importantly, whose books should we all be buying, borrowing or stealing a copy of.
“I have a crime thriller coming out in spring next year, The Killing Pool – so I’ve been reading a lot of contemporary crime novels. Jo Nesbo is great, if a little theatrical. Mark Billingham is really, really fucking good. And I’m enjoying a British writer, Quentin Bates, whose novels are set in Iceland.
“I love books with a strong sense of place. One of my favourite of recent-ish years is The Lonely Hearts Club by Raul Nunez. It’s about a night porter in a seedy Ramblas 1-star motel who bears a passing resemblance to Frank Sinatra. ‘Sinatra’ takes us on a ride through the low-life underbelly of Barcelona’s dive bars and back alleys that offers up as pungent a taste of a place through literature as I’ve known in a long time. Jean Genet meets Irvine Welsh.”
Writing is something Sampson suits as perfectly as a new pair of Sambas but, as he readily confirms, his career as a scribe didn’t get off to the best of starts – he was sacked by the NME for telling a fib, albeit quite a big one. A gig he claimed to have gone along to review was called off. When the venue burnt down.
True, or rock and roll legend? “This is all too true, I’m afraid. I’d been sending gig reviews to NME for months. To be fair to Paul du Noyer, the reviews editor, he always replied and mainly said “good writing, but we have no space.”
“This was in 1982, no email, no fax, even – it was all done by post. One day I got a letter from PdN saying – “You’re in. Congratulations.” For the next few weeks, I was getting my reviews printed in NME and I couldn’t have been more fulfilled…you’d get up on the Thursday morning and go down the newsagent, tear open the NME and read it from the back, like the sports pages.
“The downside was the pay. I was signing on, and you’d get between £5 and £10 for a review, depending how long it was. It was costing me more to see the bands than I was getting paid to write about them. So I had the brilliant idea of savaging this goth band without laying out the dough to actually go and see them. So I type up my review, post it off, go round the corner and buy the Liverpool Echo. Headline: Club Razed To Ground In Arson Attack. You can guess the rest…”
Not to be put off though, Sampson went on to make a name for himself writing for The Face, Arena, i-D, Sounds, Jamming, The Observer and Time Out.
And, the jammy dodger that he is, Sampson managed to combine his love of music with earning an honest wage, teaming up with The Farm on a host of projects – not least launching a record label.
“I’ve been dead lucky in some of my ‘jobs’,” admits Sampson, “making films, writing books etc – but being paid to start a record label during the golden age of Happy Mondays and Primal Scream and all that, and to basically do what we wanted was incredible.
“I was just about old enough to realise this was a going to be as good as life gets, and I lived the whole thing in the moment. I think a lot of people only properly appreciate their golden years after the event, but I can safely say that us lot dived in there and lived it and breathed it. Fantastic.
“If I was to pick a highlight, it was the way the Ibiza film, A Short Film About Chilling came together. It was a beautiful little film in its own right, it’s become another cult classic, too – but it was probably, more than any other one thing, responsible for catapulting The Farm from being an underground club band, to a household name. That was monumentally satisfying on a personal level.”
Was it equally as satisfying to see Awaydays finally turned into a film? The fans certainly waited long enough…
“That’s another very long story, and to even get close to an understanding of it would probably need its own book. In short, there are very few places you can take a film idea in the UK. At the time Awaydays (book) came out, there was really only Channel Four and the BBC who were fully financing movies. We got to an advanced stage with C4 then the Commissioning Editor, Robin Gutch, moved to Warp X and made a massive success of it with films like Dead Man’s Shoes and This Is England. Good on him. Robin’s successor – quite understandably – wanted to do his own projects. We then had an identical experience at the BBC. The fella there who was all over Awaydays left to set up his own company. They make things like Downton Abbey these days. There’s no denying how disappointing it is to keep on getting so close, but it’s not a conspiracy; it’s just the way life goes, up and down all the time. You just have to take it on the chin and keep going.”
Keep going he did and the cinematic version hit the big screen in 2009 amid a cauldron of interest from Sampson’s dedicated followers.
The reactions from critics were mixed. It would be fair to say it did not quite meet the heights of the book, but was Sampson himself happy with the end result?
“It’s not bad…there’s loads I wasn’t ecstatic about and there are always things that could have been done better. But, you know, it was made for a wing and a prayer. It’s a proper, nailed-on, DIY indie film, in the spirit of the independent record labels that provided the soundtrack to my youth. So, yeah – I’m proud of the little fucker, warts an’ all.”
Perhaps more so than in the book, music plays a key role in the film version. Whereas Carty and Elvis enthuse throughout the print version about their favourite bands and it is true that the reader is left in no doubt as to the importance of the blossoming scene, the film presented a chance to audibly soundtrack the action unfolding.
The choice of songs then, must have been vital.
“God yeah!” says Sampson. “Almost every track has a story behind it. Me and the film’s Producer Dave Hughes trekked out to Alderley Edge to doorstep Peter Hook. We were arrested by Redcare, this kind of private security force that very, very rich people hire to protect their properties. I hasten to add that Hooky had no idea that Recare were patrolling his neighbourhood but when we told him what had happened he laughed and said, “I can hardly say no to you now, can I?” So we were able to feature Joy Division in the film at ridiculously low prices, where they might have charged a big studio tens of thousands.
“The Magazine track [one of the stand-out scenes] needed the blessing of Howard Devoto. The problem was that he was living in Thailand. I was at Latitude with this fella Richard Thomas, a very unassuming but massively well-connected cat. I was bewailing the fact that we’d probably have to drop The Light Pours Out of Me and he just goes, hang on. Brings this well-dressed dude over, introduces him as Richard Boon. Richard Boon tells me that Devoto is going to be in Manchester the following week to sort out a property sale. Needless to say we were there, all smiles, awaiting the great Devoto’s arrival – and a possible taser attack from Redcare.”
Music aside one of the memorable scenes in the film was when Elvis ever so matter of factly tells Carty he has the “wrong trainies” – a damning indictment plenty of people will have remembered fearing.
Does Sampson, as the literary poster boy of the casual movement, still feel a pressure to dress to impress? And what are his favourite bits and bobs? “I loved the early 80s paradise island range – Samoa, Tobago but best of all, for me, were the soft leather, camel colourway Fiji. Beautiful. I haven’t seen Gary Aspden (adidas UK Head of Marketing) for a while but I used to bug him to re-issue that range. Mind you, I’m 50 now…a 50 year-old bloke in trainies is, in itself, a fashion disaster.
“Clothes wise I stick to simple understated classics – a staple diet of Smedley, Paul Smith, Nigel Hall; and I’ll wear tweed or corduroy jackets, items I’ve had for years, often.
“I just like good quality swag – nice cashmere jumpers, well-cut jackets, well-made shoes. It doesn’t have to be how-you-say ‘designer’ clobber, but you tend to find that the enduring classics are often made by the name fashion houses.”
One of the most honest aspects of Awaydays its is acceptance of the fact many Merseysiders used Stanley knives during their pitched battles on the terrace. Does Sampson believe this is deserved reputation? The catchline for Awaydays even mentions them [Catcher in the Rye with Stanley knives].
“Stanleys were definitely a part of the culture for a while,” he admits. “Horrible, scary, but there it is.”
Something else Liverpool fans have been historically criticised for is singing songs about Munich – with Manchester United supporters also boasting a songbook with heavy references to Hillsborough.
As someone who has actively campaigned for justice for the 96, surely this is something Sampson looks equally unfavourably upon? Should the Hillsborough chants lead to arrest? Surprisingly, Sampson thinks not.
“I’m going to put my head on the chopping block here and say that this part of fan culture, while regrettable, is understandable.
“It’s far to easy to become pious about what is, at its best, a passionate and volatile spectator sport. I don’t think Man United fans are celebrating the disaster in itself – it’s more a means of expressing their consummate loathing for all things Liverpool. It may be below the belt and below most peoples’ plimsol line for good taste, but I really don’t think it’s personal. It’s business.”
The fact that justice finally seems to be coming no doubt softens the blow of the chanting. Sampson has been vocal in his admiration for Anne Williams and her fight for an early inquest into the death of her son Kevin, and the writer finds it easy to remember where he was as the disaster unfolded.
“I remember it all too clearly. I was with my brother and our mates Hobo and Mauro, at the semi-final of the F.A Cup between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest, at Hillsborough.
“My brother Neil was one of the first to start pulling the advertising hoardings down to use as stretchers. Everyone who was at that end of the ground that day knew exactly what had happened, so it was a complete and utter shock to get home and find out that the disaster had been reported as a football riot.
“My young brother saw the crushing and the deaths up close. He was traumatised, no two ways about it. He never went to a game again for years. I told him repeatedly he should seek counselling but he didn’t want to know. Just locked it all up inside and never ever referred to it.
“The truth coming out has been a massive release for him, emotionally, being given the hope that all his efforts that day might not have been in vain.
“Personally, having been going to away games since the early 70s, I was used to the police making up whatever they wanted and doing whatever they wanted. So when the Independent Panel was first announced nearly two years ago I just thought, “Oh aye, as if they’re going to find anything incriminating after all these years…” It was a combination of shock and complete and utter exhilaration when I found myself listening to Cameron, live from the House of Commons, lambasting the smear campaign and the wholesale cover-up that had taken place from top to bottom. It was one of those rare moments where you’re aware that what is happening is history in the making – that’s how it felt, standing in my Ma’s kitchen, listening to her radio. So, finally, The Truth is out there…just a matter of Justice being done, now.”
Sampson has a new book out soon, the aforementioned crime thriller Gangsterland. So does he have any words of wisdom for aspiring authors possibly starting out along the road he has found so rewarding?
Yes. And the message is a simple one: “Start. Today. Now.”
And last but not least, what DID happen to Carty?
“I often find myself wondering. Elvis went to Berlin. Maybe Carty went out there, too.”  
]]>
tag:collectiveidentity.posthaven.com,2013:Post/345611 2011-04-27T22:05:00Z 2013-10-08T16:35:40Z Away Days clips

Away Days is an interesting film as not only is it a conventional ‘youth’ film that concerns itself with coming of age situations such as love, experimentation and growing up, it also constructs a representation of collective identity within it – namely The Pack. The Pack is the football firm that our hero, Carty, becomes a member of, a group that have a distinct identity that is easy to apply our main definition of collective identity:

‘a shared sense of ‘one-ness’ or ‘we-ness’ anchored in real or imagined shared attributes and experiences among those who comprise the collectivity and in relation or contrast to one or more actual imagined sets of ‘others’.

Have a look at this clip. Try to identify what shared attributes The Pack have, also look at how they define themselves (and in how the film does) in terms of a group of others.

Some thoughts: The obvious shared attributes are for The Pack appearance, swagger, regionality and attitude. However, this mainly comes into focus once the set of ‘others’, the rival gang, are introduced:
Side partings vs long hair sideburns
Trainers vs boots
Lee jeans vs baggy denim
Peter Storm vs donkey jackets
Young, cocky, beautiful vs old and uglyJust look at the way the camera treats the two groups – the slo-mo, longing takes, the cool music. There’s no doubt who the film ‘loves’.

In this second clip we see Carty getting ready for his time with The Pack. What’s interesting about it is that we seeing the transformation from Carty, the son, the brother, the responsible one, into Carty the nutter in the Pack. He’s changing from identity into another. Have a look at how he does this: 

 

Some thoughts: there’s a physical and mental change. The mental change sees him almost psyche himself up for the away trip, the physical is depicted almost like a ritual as he gets dresses – carefully laying out his clothes. The other interesting things is that Carty runs to his meeting with Elvis – this is an expression wanting to be free from the Carty he is with his family (the young Carty) in order to become the new powerful respected Carty.

Away Days is a film partly about ‘youth’ and so has the types of representations we see in other youth films, but also it is about a sub culture – namely the football casual. This Wikipedia page should give you the basic but here’s a good from the LFC site and another that references Kevin Sampson, Away Days author.

Focusing on a subculture is what often happens when the media creates a retrospective representation of youth. Just have a look at this clip from Shane Meadows This Is England which focuses upon the mid 80s Skinhead subculture – compare this with the Away Days, look for similarities.
 

 

 

Both films focus upon two groups that have an identity that is largely defined by fashion, but also by media consumption and recreational choices. Also they have this ‘becoming scene’, a sequence of changing identity through clothes and mentality that allows them to be part of a group. Also this changes how the main character view themselves and how other people view them.

This type of representation of youth is a popular choice for the media. Have a look the trailers for films and TV series that choose to focus on a youth subculture and tend to romanticise them.

Soul Boy (2010)
 

Quadrophenia (1973) - A film made in 1973 about 1965 Mod Culture

 

Tom Green, the director of the TV Misfits, is working on a film tentatively titled ‘Spike Island’ about the late 80’s early 90’s Manchester scene.

 

David Buckingham writes that 'Recent research has pointed to the dangers of romanticising youthful resistance and the tendency to overstate the political dimensions of youth culture.’ This suggests that films tend to embed these youth sub cultures within a political backdrop (Thatcher’s 80s for Away Days and This Is England) and suggest that the culture is a reaction against that. What Buckingham suggests is that this element is overstated – that we should remember that these are ‘sub cultures’ rather ‘counter cultures’. 

]]>